|
Wolves in Sheep's Clothing |
Rahm Emmanuel, former Clinton adviser, current
congressman from Illinois, staunch supporter of Israel, and suspected by
many of being "Mega", the Mossad mole in the Clinton White House, has a brother,
Ari Emmanuel, who just happens to be Michael Moore's agent.
"Fahrenheit 9/11" is a powerful antiwar statement and needs to be supported
for that reason. This coming election, we need to vote out the warhawks,
both Republican and Democrat.
However, I would like to ask Michael Moore a few questions regarding his
implication that Saudi Arabia was behind 9-11.
Question 1: If Saudi Arabia were behind 9-11, why didn't they leave the United
States BEFORE the attack? It is an established fact that companies like Odigo
received an advance warning of the 9-11 attacks before the hijacked planes
had even left the ground, as reported in Ha'Aretz and the Washington Post.
If the Saudis were behind 9-11 and were kind enough to warn Odigo, then why
did they themselves wait until AFTER the attacks before they left, when the
requirement for special permission from Bush would only call attention to
their departure?
Question 2: Is Michael Moore aware that the video tape of Osama "confessing"
to 9-11 has been proven a fake?
Question 3: Is Michael Moore aware that just ten days after 9-11, the FBI
stated (and CNN reported) that the 9-11 perpetrators were using skillfully
made fake IDs with identities stolen from Arab men?
Question 4: Is Michael Moore aware that FBI Director Robert Mueller has admitted
in public that there is actually no evidence that proves the named 9-11 hijackers
were actually on the aircraft?
Question 5: Calling attention to the Anthrax letters case, in which letters
which appeared to to be written by Arab Muslims contained Anthrax spores
identified as coming from a US Government laboratory. Is Michael Moore aware
that neither of the two suspects in the case, Dr. Stephen Hatfill or Dr.Philip
Zack, are Arabs, and doesn't this case prove that Arabs are being framed
for terror attacks in the United States?
Michael Moore rightly condemns the US Government for the USAPATRIOT act's
draconian assault opon our rights. However, one of those rights is that nobody
shall be declared guilty of a crime without proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
As Michael Moore professes a deep respect for American values, he should
not glibly declare that someone is guilty of a crime without being able to
make his case beyond that reasonable doubt.
There is a reasonable doubt.
And if Michael Moore is a reasonable man who respects American principles,
he must acknowledge that.