America, the land of the free and the home of the brave? or. . . the land of the fee and the home of the slave? The "American Revolution" is as well known an apparition as is the "War For Independence". Sadly, once again the spot-light is beamed upon a massive lie; in fact this one is a double-whammy. Not only was that war NOT a spontaneous uprising against tyranny, we Americans were fooled into believing we "won" that war.
Remembering that the Jews claim sole responsibility for the French Revolution -- in fact they claim responsibility for ALL revolutions-- consider the time line here:
1) The American revolution began in 1776, the alleged date of the 'founding' of the Illuminati, although the plan within Weishaupt's papers were probably given to Weishaupt by another source since the plan for World Dominion is eons old. As Douglas Reed mentioned in his chapter on the Protocols, one individual could not have devised such an intricate scheme.
2) In 1777 a wealthy Frenchman, the Marquis de Lafayette (whose full name was Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Montierin - 1757-1834):
". . . purchased a ship and with a crew of adventurers [revolutionaries] and sailed for America to fight in the revolution against the British. He joined the ranks as a major general and was assigned to the staff of George Washington. He served with distinction, leading American forces to several victories. " www.americanrevolution.com/LafayetteCitizenship.htm
According to the website cited above, Lafayette came from a long line of soldiers; he studied at the Military Academy in Versailles and became a captain in the French calvary at age 16. So we have a professionally trained military expert whipping the American colonists into a fighting force. In 1779 he persuaded the French government to send aid to the Americans.
3) After Cornwallis' surrender at Yorktown Lafayette returned to Paris where he "cooperated closely with Ambassadors Benjamin Franklin and then Thomas Jefferson" (both Illuminists), possibly working out the details of the planned Constitutional Convention in 1787. (As a side note: Thomas Jefferson had commissioned an obelisk to be placed on his grave at his death.)
4) Lafayette not only fought in the American Revolution along with other French troops, upon returning to France he began to foment and then fought in the French Revolution which began in 1791. Then, again in 1830 he "became the leader of a Revolution that dethroned the Bourbons". As we learned in the last chapter, Lafayette was a Freemason and the Grand Master of the Grand Orient Lodge until his death. He was an international revolutionary!
According to his bio Lafayette's father died when he was two, then eleven years later his mother and grandfather died leaving Lafayette immensely wealthy. On reading that, I wondered if he had been "chosen" by the priesthood to become their minion, and also wondered if his mother and grandfather's deaths at the same time (or at least in the same year) were by natural causes, accidental, or perhaps planned by the creatures to put the wealth into the hands of their minion.
Now, to examine the Jews' (Freemasons') roll in the American Revolution, let us begin with an article by Jerry Klinger, titled How the Jews Saved the American Revolution, from the Jewish Magazine. www.jewishmag.com/80mag/usa3/usa3.htm.
Klinger's article is prefaced with a statement allegedly made by Admiral Sir George Rodney, commander of the British Fleet, February, 1781. (All emphasis is ours.)
"They (the Jews of St. Eustatius, Caribbean Antilles) cannot too soon be taken care of - they are notorious in the cause of America and France.""The Colonial American Jewish experience 1654 - 1770 was characterized by sharp departures from historic European anti-Semitic patterns of isolation, social, economic, physical, legislative and religious discrimination.
"The American Colonial world was growing, changing and evolving so rapidly it did not have time to focus on historical Jewish scapegoat-ism. The demands of the frontier and the expanding new American economic power needed the best of all of its people.
"Jews in Colonial America struggled and won rights that were inconceivable and nonexistent in Europe. Jews struggled for and won the rights to equal economic opportunity, to own land, to go to higher secular education, to serve in the armed militias, to vote and in some colonies to become members of the legislative bodies. In some colonies the struggle was easy, in others it was very hard.
"The American experience was not an automatic entitlement to toleration and sufferance, rather the pre-revolutionary experience was one that permitted the old discriminations to be challenged and eventually to be put aside. Hatred of the Jew and imported anti-Semitism did exist but it could not flourish in the melting pot of common need and survival.
". . . Jews traced their earliest participation in Virginia's life from the 16th century with Sir Walter Raleigh through Jamestown and the revolution. The first permanent synagogue community Kehilah ha Kadosh Beth Shalome, was founded in 1789 in Richmond, Va. . .
The "first permanent synagogue community, Kehilah ha Kadosh". . . as in Knights Kadosch degree of Freemasonry? Being admittedly redundant, let's once again review the initiation ceremony into that degree from the last chapter, according to the master of ceremony:
"The Order of Knights Kadosch has for its mission the avenging of a great crime. . . Do you fully understand that this degree is not, like much of so-called Masonry, a sham that means nothing and amounts to nothing; . . . that what you are now engaged in is real, will require the performance of duty, will exact sacrifice, will expose you to danger; and that this Order means to deal with the affairs of nations and be once more a Power in the world?"
Jerry Klinger continues:
". . . The Jews tended to settle wherever doors were open; most frequently in the urban environments but also in rural and frontier areas."Jews did not come seeking freedom of religion as much as freedom of opportunity.
"Traditional Judaism weakened in the face of American freedom of choice only to be reborn later with an American voice. The American Revolution, 1776-1783, did not start out intentionally as a revolution.
Of course it did: a well-planned and obviously long-time plotted Revolution.
"The British government failed to realize that the Colonials saw themselves as British Americans with the right to a voice in their affairs, to influence their laws, their economy their frontiers and their taxation. The Revolutionary war was to be the longest war in American history prior to Vietnam. It was fought over a one thousand five hundred mile front on the developed farmlands of thirteen colonies, on the sea and on the frontier.
"Oct. 25. 1765, a group of Philadelphia merchants gathered in the State House to sign the non-importation agreement to fight the hated Stamp Tax of the British government. The first man to step forward to sign his name was the president of Mikve Israel Congregation, Philadelphia's only synagogue, Mathias Bush.
"As the tensions between Britain and the American Colonies increased and finally erupted into war the American Colonial population was split almost into thirds; one third supported the war, one third was neutral and one third was pro British. The small Jewish population of America was also divided the choice though was very heavily and disproportionately in favor and support of the American Revolution. Not only did the Jews pledge their fortunes and sacred honor for America but their very lives.
". . . in Philadelphia, July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was written. A copy was sent to Amsterdam via the small Dutch Caribbean Island of St. Eustatius. The Declaration was intercepted by the British at sea."An accompanying letter with the Declaration of Independence was also intercepted and sent to London as being a secret code about the document that needed to be deciphered - the letter was written in Yiddish.
We might ask here: WHY was a copy of the Declaration of Independence sent to Amsterdam via the Jews at St. Eustatius? It is likely that the final details of the planned "American Revolution" were worked out from that quarter. We are not privy to the content of the letter that accompanied the document, just the fact that it was written in Yiddish.
This next recalls Reuben Finkh's assertion (from Chapter 12) that "Some of the Jewish traders of Newport and Philadelphia were among the largest ship owners in America".
"The war was not going well at first for the young American army. Though facing hard times and even defeat, Jews stood and fought along with their neighbors. . . . Joseph Simon from his frontier forge at Lancaster, Pa. supplied the Army with the famous Henry Rifles. Jewish trading merchants, peaceful before the war, outfitted their ships to become privateers and ravage the British at sea.
". . . In the area of finance the young American government might have foundered too except for the financial genius and personal financial risk and support taken on by Haym Solomon. Solomon was to die bankrupted by his total support of the American cause. Though small in number the Jews chose to cast their fate with America.
No; the Jews did not cast their fate with America. The Jews cast their fate -- as always -- with the Revolution. The story about Solomon "dying bankrupt" is questionable and highly unlikely, as we shall see that among other things he was a Rothschild agent. And, when we take a clear look at the past, beneath the lies into which we've all been born, America did not "win" the Revolutionary War, any more than Great Britain lost. More on that later.
"But how did the Jews save the American Revolution? As late as 1781 the war had not been won by the Americans nor was it lost by the British. Arms were being funneled into the Colonies by arms merchants running the British blockade primarily from the tiny free trading Island of Dutch St. Eustatius. Jewish merchants and arms traders were a major presence on the island.
"In 1781, the British realized they had to cut off the open door of arms shipments to the rebels through St. Eustatius. Admiral Sir George Rodney was sent to capture the island. His goal was to destroy the supplies and destroy the island's commercial and merchant class so they could not provide any more aide to the rebels. Early in 1781 the lightly defended island fell to the heavy presence of the main British battle fleet. . ."While Rodney was engaged in St. Eustatius, Lord Cornwallis and his army of British regulars were forced out of the Carolinas and retreated to the small port of Yorktown, Virginia on the James Peninsula. He needed to await critical reprovisioning and fresh reinforcements being brought by the British fleet. The weakened British fleet, with Cornwallis's reinforcements, was intercepted at sea by the French fleet under Admiral DeGrasse and soundly defeated. Degrasse took up positions at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay blockading Yorktown from the Sea.
"But how did the Jews save the American Revolution? If the Jews had not helped turn St. Eustatius into a major arms center for the Revolution and if Admiral Rodney had not spent so much time destroying St. Eustatius and particularly the Jews, the war might have ended differently. There is little doubt that Admiral Rodney's anti-Semitism helped squander his time and played a role in delaying and weakening the British fleet. Ironically it was the Jews of St. Eustatius who helped win the American Revolution.
Notice the author of this piece claims that Admiral Rodney was anti-Semitic in destroying St. Eustatius, not because Jews had established a powerful arms center feeding the war machine against Britain. No, they were destroyed simply because Rodney was anti-Semitic. You will notice this anomaly running throughout all "historical" writings by Jews.
Now let us discover more about the Freemason, Haym Solomon (also spelled Salomon'), his partnership with Jew William Morris, the creation of the First Bank of America,and the loans made to the New World via Solomon's association with the Rothschilds of England. We'll see once again that they foment war (Revolution), fund both sides and become immensely more wealthy in the process. This first is from the Jewish World Review at: jewishworldreview.com/jewish/salomon.asp
Haym Salomon: The rest of the story
Michael Feldberg
"IN the pantheon of American Jewish heroes, Haym Salomon (1740-1785) has attained legendary status. His life was brief and tumultuous, but his impact on the American imagination was great. The U.S. Postal Service issued a stamp hailing Salomon as a 'Financial Hero of the American Revolution'. A monument to Salomon, George Washington and Robert Morris graces East Wacker Drive in Chicago; and Beverly Hills, California, is home to an organization called the American Jewish Patriots and Friends of Haym Salomon.
"Born in Lissa, Poland, in 1740, Salomon spent several years moving around western Europe and England, developing fluency in several languages that served him well for the remainder of his life. Reaching New York City in 1772, he swiftly established himself as a successful merchant and dealer in foreign securities."Striking up an acquaintance with Alexander MacDougall, leader of the New York Sons of Liberty, Salomon became active in the patriot cause. When war broke out in 1776, Salomon got a contract to supply American troops in central New York. In 1777, he married Rachel Franks, whose brother Isaac was a lieutenant colonel on George Washington's staff. Their ketubah resides at the American Jewish Historical Society.
"In the wake of a fire that destroyed much of New York City, British occupation forces arrested and imprisoned Salomon. He gained release because the British hoped to use his language skills to communicate with their German mercenaries. Instead, Salomon covertly encouraged the Hessians to desert. Arrested again in early 1778, Salomon had his property confiscated. A drum-head court martial sentenced him to hang. Salomon escaped probably with the help of other Sons of Liberty and fled penniless to Philadelphia. His wife and child joined him soon afterward.
He arrived penniless and without property to Philadelphia. What a miraculous recovery Mr. Salomon made:
"In Philadelphia, Salomon resumed his brokerage business. The French Minister appointed him paymaster general of the French forces fighting for the American cause. The Dutch, and Spanish governments also engaged him to sell the securities that supported their loans to the Continental Congress.
"In 1781, Congress established the Office of Finance to save the United States from fiscal ruin. Salomon allied himself with Superintendent of Finance William Morris and became one of the most effective brokers of bills of exchange to meet federal government expenses. Salomon also personally advanced funds to members of the Continental Congress and other federal officers, charging interest and commissions well below the market rates. James Madison confessed that "I have for some time ... been a pensioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a Jew broker."
The Jew, William Morris was an attendee at the treasonous Constitutional Convention in 1787, along with many other Jew and non-Jew lawyers, land barons, money-lenders, etc. In a book titled An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, by Charles A. Beard (Macmillan Co., 1913), a bio was given on all fifty-five men present at that gathering. The end-result of that Convention was to enrich those attendees (and their posterity), and to create a strong central government that would become all-powerful as more and more politicians -- especially those in the several states -- succumbed to the lures of money, power and influence.
The writers of the Constitution knew full well that corporate U.S. Government would one day be controlled -- it was already then as it is today -- by Freemasons and Jews; its function from the beginning was to bring in their New World Order, the unearthly, ungodly plan for World Dominion ruled by cruel, perverted, coldly calculating, heartless creatures whose origin is still a puzzlement for me. Continuing with Haym Solomon:
"While supporting the national cause, Salomon also played a prominent role in the Philadelphia and national Jewish community affairs. He served as a member of he governing council of Philadelphia's Congregation Mikveh Israel. He was treasurer of Philadelphia's society for indigent travelers, and participated in the nation's first known rabbinic court of arbitration."Salomon helped lead the successful fight to repeal the test oath which barred Jews and other non-Christians from holding public office in Pennsylvania.
It's interesting to note that no matter where the Jews live, no matter what the laws of the particular nation, they are allowed to have their own courts. When they were allegedly 'captives' in Babylon they were allowed to live apart in their own section under their own laws. It makes one wonder who controlled the King of Babylon at that time. My guess would be the priesthood, as it appears to be the controlling hand behind pharaohs, kings, and today's prime ministers and presidents.
"Salomon operated within the context of a society, and an age, that considered all Jews as Shylocks and money grubbers. In 1784, writing as 'A Jew Broker', Salomon protested charges that Jewish merchants were profiteering. Salomon thought it unjust that such charges were 'cast so indiscriminately on the Jews of this city at large . . . for the faults of a few'. His impassioned defense of his fellow Jews brought him national approbation.
"Within five years of his arrival in Philadelphia, Salomon advanced from penniless fugitive to respected businessman, philanthropist and defender of his people. He risked his fortune, pledged his good name and credit on behalf of the Revolution, and stood up for religious liberty."Despite financial setbacks at the end of his life, Salomon's name is forever linked to the idealism and success of the American Revolution, and to the contributions Jews have made to the cause of American freedom. www.explore-biography.com/business_figures/H/Haym_Solomon.html
Here's another bio on Mr. Solomon, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haym_Solomon. We'll delete some of the redundancy:
"Haym Solomon (or Salomon) (1740 - 1785) was a prime financier of the American side during the American War of Independence against Great Britain."He was an astute merchant and banker and succeeded in accumulating a huge fortune, which he subsequently devoted to the use of the American Government during the American Revolution. For example, he negotiated all the war aid from France and Holland, endorsing and selling bills to American merchants. He was a brilliant financier and one of George Washington's personal friends.
"At one point he was sentenced to death by the British, but he bribed his jailer and escaped.
Hmmm. He 'bribed his jailer". The previous account tells us that he "escaped, probably with help from the Sons Of Liberty". I've noticed that the accounts of history written by the Jews are sprinkled with as many contradictions and inconsistencies as the Bible. Given they control the education system in the U.S., as well as the text books, it is understandable that everything (other than possibly names and dates) that we learned about history in schools and colleges are fabrications. Continuing with Haym Solomon:
"During the American Revolution, Solomon went to France and raised an additional 3.5 million British pounds from the Sassoon and Rothschild banking houses and families."He spoke eight languages. When Solomon was in France he passed himself off as a French diplomat.
"Solomon supposedly wrote the first draft of the United States Constitution according to some historians. Some claim that he designed The Great Seal of the United States , which is why it has what some believe resembles a Jewish Star above the eagle's head design, and it is also on the back of every American one dollar bill. He believed the United States would become a world power.
IF Solomon accomplished all those feats, it would mean simply that he was carrying out orders from his superiors. Being a Jew insider, he would know the plan for the U.S. as a world power, chief among the power-trips being the establishment of the "state" of Israel from where the U.S. government is being administrated today. And it is clear that the artificial state of Israel WAS created by the machinations of the Jews controlling Harry Solomon Truman.
"[Solomon] was involved in Jewish community affairs, being a member of Mikveh Israel Congregation in Philadelphia, and in 1782 made the largest individual contribution towards the construction of its main building. In 1783 Haym Solomon and other prominent Jews appealed to the Pennsylvania Council of Censors urging them to remove the religious test oath required for office-holding under the State Constitution. In 1784, he answered Anti-Semitic slander in the press by stating:"I am a Jew; it is my own nation; I do not despair that we shall obtain every other privilege that we aspire to enjoy along with our fellow-citizens."
"In 1893 a bill was presented before the 52nd United States Congress ordering a gold medal struck in recognition of Solomon's contributions to the United States. In 1941 the writer Howard Fast wrote a book "Haym Salomon Son of Liberty". In 1941, the George Washington-Robert Morris-Haym Salomon Memorial was erected along Wacker Drive in downtown Chicago.
"In 1975 the United States Postal Service issued a commemorative stamp honoring Haym Soloman for his contributions to the cause of the American Revolution. This stamp was uniquely printed on the front and the back. On the glue side of the stamp, the following words were printed in pale, green ink:
"Businessman and broker Haym Salomon was responsible for raising most of the money needed to finance the American Revolution and later to save the new nation from collapse.""Many Historians have said that without his contribution to the cause "there would be no America today". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haym_Solomon
Rather, let us say, there would possibly be no Jew/Freemason controlled America today. We will excerpt two more short items on Hyam Solomon, and then be done with it. If it appears to our reader that we sometimes "over-do", it is simply because the information is so far removed from what we've been taught and fervently believed about the history of America that I am compelled to do whatever necessary to clear the cobwebs. . . maybe "rinse out the suds" left from the life-long brain-washing to which we've all been subjected. .
Here's one from scripturesforamerica.org/html2/jm0022g.htm, although I must qualify the use of this website by saying that it is promulgating the Identity Christian angle, leading its 'lost sheep' into the Talmudic religion, and the specific article from which this was taken proceeds to eulogize the founders of America.
"From the time when the old Jew Amschel Mayer began to cultivate the friendship of William the Landgrave in Germany; down through George III and his need for money and mercenaries to fight the Colonists in the Revolution, Amschel Mayer was in touch with the American situation through the Jew Haym Solomon of Philadelphia, who made it possible for Robert Morris to finance the Colonials and thus place them under obligations to the International Jews."Haym Solomon who has been eulogized by Jew and gentile alike for his financial services to the colonies, worked secretly with Mayer, so that once again we find Jews financing and getting rich off both sides in a war.
Here's more from another perspective:
"Haym Solomon and partners: Since the federal takeover 150 years prior to the state of Israel, the star of david has appeared at the top of the US federal seal above the eagle's head believed to be an 'homage' to the wealthy New York City Zionist banker and Jewish Freemason, Haym Solomon, friend of George Washington, who was the primary financier/broker behind the American Revolution, arms, supplies. He was then the legendary elite Zionist richman 'hero' who saved the new nation from doom by brokering bills of exchange when congress established the office of finance in 1781 to 'rescue the new nation from fiscal ruin'.
"This pattern is much like how East India Company corrupted the House of Lords in England by gifting them lucrative stock that made East India's fiscal hurdles/successes a matter of England's national security. It was around 1600 when Queen Elizabeth made the East India Company the first limited liability corporation to manage the exploitation of the planet/people protected by her puppet empire.
"East India does one better in the New World by arriving first, surveying the land, naming the colonies, reserving highlands and estates for the aristocracy and lowlands to slave colonist/settlers and their chattel, then leasing ships out to the pilgrims/migrants and managing the colonies.
"They have the king issue the royal proclamation of 1763 that really starts to put the oppression thumbscrews on colonists in the homeland to provoke passionate uprising then in partnership with Zion and Freemason operatives this axis of evil mixed of legendary forefathers actually coopt the revolution long before it happens and turn East India's 13-striped corporate flag of tyranny downed in Boston Harbor into the "flag of freedom" via Freemason and East India surveyor George Washington.http://truth-now.com/download/
We'll take a short side-trip now to clear up some more lies we've been taught in history concerning the American "victory" over Great Britain. When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington on October 19th, 1781, he surrendered the battle, not the war. Under the Articles of Capitulation, the common British soldiers were held in forts, under conditions that they were fed the same as American troops; the officers -- one for every fifty soldiers -- lived nearby to see to their good treatment, while the officers themselves lived in fine quarters in society being served like royalty; the injured were hospitalized and treated, all at the cost of Americans (as usual).
The war had not been formally ended; and in fact, it was nearly six months later -- in March, 1782 -- that the House of Commons finally settled on a resolution to advise the king that the fighting part of the war should end. . . to be continued to this day, under cover, with silent weapons for quiet wars. From The History of the American Revolution, Vol. 2, Ramsay, 617-9, we read:
". . . Dec. 12,1781, it was moved in the House of Commons that a resolution should be adopted declaring it to be their opinion,
"That all farther attempts to reduce the Americans to obedience by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to the true interests of Great Britain."
The resolution failed at that time. Then:
"General Conway in five days after (Feb. 27), brought forward another motion expressed in different words, but to the same effect with that which he had lost by a single vote. This caused a long debate which lasted till two o'clock in the morning. It was then moved to adjourn the debate till the 13th of March.
". . . together with other suspicious circumstances, induced General Conway to move another resolution, expressed in the most decisive language. This was to the following effect that,
"The house would consider as enemies to his majesty and the country, all those who should advise or by any means attempt the further prosecution of offensive war, on the continent of North America, for the purpose of reducing the colonies to obedience by force."
"This motion after a feeble opposition was carried without a division. . . This resolution and the preceding address, to which it had reference, may be considered as the closing scene of the American war."
In other words, the good ol' boys got together and decided to stop the fighting. They had other ways to control their subjects (slaves) in America other than by "force", via the Rothschild banking cartel. It's interesting to note, too, that although the fighting stopped in 1781, the actual Treaty of Peace was not finalized until 1783.
Under this treaty the King, his heirs, subjects, etc. were allowed to keep, in perpetuity, any property they owned in America, without having to become American citizens; as well the King (and his heirs and successors) was to retain mineral rights: one third of all gold, silver and copper mined in America. The King granted fishing rights even designating where the fishermen could clean and dry their fish. To the victor go the spoils?
Nearly a decade later another very controversial treaty was signed, on November 19, 1794 -- Jay's Treaty -- named after US Supreme Court justice John Jay, allegedly attempting to "clear up some of the lingering problems of American separation from Great Britain", namely: the British were causing problems in and around the territory of the U.S.; had not attended to all of the war reparations (such as compensation for large-scale theft of slaves) agreed to in the 1783 treaty.
The British also continued to occupy western military posts and to pursue fur trading in the Great Lakes region as if it were their own. Further, they interfered with shipping traffic in the Caribbean, searching American ships for contraband and impressing American seamen into service to the crown. Odd goings-on, to say the least, within a country that had allegedly defeated the British.
"The agreement with which Jay returned did not satisfy anyone. No surprise to Hamilton, who had secretly informed the British before hand that the Americans would be willing to compromise on most issues.
"The British agreed to just two items: a removal from the western posts (and even then at their own very conditional convenience), and to allow small American ships to trade in the West Indies. The Royal Navy would continue to decide American sovereignty with regard to shipping on a case-by-case basis. Criticism of the Federalist administration was already raging and most people saw this treaty as a terrible compromise to American interests.
"Jay was burned in effigy [by mobs of outraged Americans] in numerous rural areas. Hamilton was stoned in New York City when he defended the treaty at a mass meeting. Though the treaty was ratified by a narrow margin in the Senate, the House later tried to block it by refusing to fund it. Washington, through careful political maneuvering, managed to quell the motion and give the treaty the force of law." www.leftjustified.com/leftjust/lib/sc/ht/fed/jbio.html
Another account tells us that:
"All other outstanding issues -- the Canadian-Maine boundary, compensation for pre-revolutionary debts, and British seizures of American ships -- were to be resolved by arbitration. Jay even conceded that the British could seize U.S. goods bound for France if they paid for them and could confiscate without payment French goods on American ships. The treaty was immensely unpopular; 'Sir John Jay' became one of the most hated Americans, 'damned and double damned' for caving in to the British." http://www.americanrevolution.com/JaysTreaty.htm
Another excerpt confirms the hostility Jay's Treaty created:
Feeling against Jay's Treaty ran high and Hamilton was stoned by an angry crowd in New York. Nevertheless, the Senate ratified the agreement with a reservation inserted regarding a provision that limited American trade in the British West Indies. Washington, after much agonizing, approved the treaty.
Jay's Treaty is significant in part because of the tremendous uproar it caused; Washington was still a widely admired man, but he came under sharp attack during this time. Jay resigned from the Supreme Court and later remarked that he could have traveled the length of the country by the light of bonfires burning his effigy.
Most historians acknowledge the Treaty's shortcomings, but believe that it was the best that could be hoped for given America's lack of international clout at the time. http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h455.html
We read in this one that the treaty was promulgated by Alexander Hamilton, a King's man, and a Bankers' man to the hilt, and possibly a Jew himself:
The treaty, which owed much to the influence of Alexander Hamilton , caused a storm of indignation in America. Jay was denounced and burned in effigy, Hamilton was stoned while speaking in its defense, and the treaty was called a complete surrender of American rights. http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/section/JaysTrea_AStormyReception.asp
Aside: Information on Hamilton, who was born in the Caribbeans leaves the question of his Jewish roots open to further research:
"Hamilton's mother, Rachel Faucett, after her separation from her Danish-Jewish husband John Michal Lavien, cohabited with a Scotsman, James Hamilton, in Nevis and gave birth to Alexander. The Anglican Church could not offer full acceptance of the situation...(and) denied Alexander membership or education in the church school. He was enrolled in a private school on Nevis taught by a Jewish head mistress and...soon was fluent in Hebrew and French." www.sefarad.org/publication/lm/035/15.html
The furor over Jay's Treaty occurred nine years after the alleged victory by American patriots who had "won the War of Independence". One more telling quote should appear here, in case our reader has a lingering impression that Americans are freemen. The Paris Treaty (Peace Treaty of 1783) begins with this description of the King of England as the "prince elector of the United States of America":
"In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
"It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America. . . " Paris Peace Treaty 1783
_____________________________
For all intents and purposes, this chapter was finished. . . I thought. During the research on these last two chapters we stumbled across the following, relating to the French Revolution. A short excerpt for our reader. Can you see the "signature" here, once again, bringing us from those turbulent times to our present turbulent times? Obviously, this piece is written by one of their own minions. Read this:
"If the guillotine is the most striking negative image of the French Revolution, then the most positive is surely the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, one of the founding documents in the human rights tradition.
"The lasting importance of the Declaration of Rights is immediately evident: just compare the first article from August 1789 with the first article in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights passed by the United Nations after World War II, on 10 December 1948.
"They are very similar, though the UN document refers to 'human beings' in place of 'men'. (Did "men" mean women too in 1789? As we shall see, this was far from clear.)
Maybe those words were differentiated in the UN document because, as we discovered in the Talmud, only Jews are "human beings", the goy considered as no more than animals. Lets look at each of these articles for ourselves. But first, let's look at the authors of the French Declaration, and no wonder we see the same signatures! The question we must ask is: "Who wrote the Declaration of Independence? or "advised" the Illuminist, Thomas Jefferson? From the website at www.constitution.org/fr/fr_drm.htm at the bottom of the text of the French Declaration, we read:
"The above document was written by The Marquis de Lafayette, with help from his friend and neighbor, American envoy to France, Thomas Jefferson. Lafayette, you may recall, had come to the Colonies at age 19, been commissioned a Major General, and was instrumental in the defeat of the British during the American Revolutionary War. He considered one special man his 'father': George Washington. French King Louis XVI signed this document, under duress, but never intended to support it. Indeed, the Revolution in France soon followed, leading to the tyrannical rule of Napoleon Bonaparte."
Napoleon Bonaparte, a tyrannical ruler? When a leader is vilified by the 'victors', we automatically ask: How did they become a threat to the priestly sect, and its plan for World Dominion? From the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, Approved by the National Assembly of France, August 26, 1789:
Article 1: Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.
From the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
It all sounds so good, so benevolent, doesn't it? It's meant to sound good and benevolent; it must in order to seduce the uninformed and naive masses into supporting their planned enslavement and ultimate demise. We see "by their fruits" that the architects of this plan do not practice what they preach. We'll return now to the French Revolution, a short excerpt:
"When the French revolutionaries [Jews/Freemasons] drew up the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen in August 1789, they aimed to topple the institutions surrounding hereditary monarchy and establish new ones based on the principles of the Enlightenment, a philosophical movement gathering steam in the eighteenth century.
1789. . . the year the treasonous Constitution for the United States of America was ratified.
"The goal of the Enlightenment's proponents was to apply the methods learned from the scientific revolution to the problems of society. Further, its advocates committed themselves to "reason" and "liberty." Knowledge, its followers believed, could only come from the careful study of actual conditions and the application of an individual's reason, not from religious inspiration or traditional beliefs.
"Liberty meant freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom from unreasonable government (torture, censorship, and so on). Enlightenment writers, such as Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau, influenced ordinary readers, politicians, and even heads of state all over the Western world. Kings and queens consulted them, government ministers joined their cause, and in the British North American colonies, American revolutionaries put some of their ideas into practice in the Declaration of Independence and the new Constitution of the United States.
"The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen of 1789 brought together two streams of thought: one springing from the Anglo-American tradition of legal and constitutional guarantees of individual liberties, the other from the Enlightenment's belief that reason should guide all human affairs.
"Enlightenment writers praised the legal and constitutional guarantees established by the English and the Americans, but they wanted to see them applied everywhere."The French revolutionaries therefore wrote a Declaration of Rights that they hoped would serve as a model in every corner of the world. Reason rather than tradition would be its justification. As a result, "France" or "French" never appears in the articles of the declaration itself, only in its Preamble. http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/chap3a.html
Now, we continue to chapter 19, which has been written and posted for months, awaiting the insertion of these past three. I will have to read that one again to see if we have maintained or lost continuity in the stream of thought.
The thought I've had is that we've taken a magnifying glass to just one little piece of history from two hundred years ago -- the settling of America, the Revolution, the restructuring of the whole mechanism of government via the treasonous Constitutional Convention -- looking through that glass and scrutinizing many of the details that heretofore have been outside of our scope of vision. We come away from that examination with a clearer understanding of the whole play and its nefarious plot, along with the writers, producers, directors and especially the actors/players.
We can then use that little piece of history as a pattern, knowing it has been repeated over and over and over again, from eons ago up to today, from countries all over this planet. I no longer "believe" America was founded to bring in the final stages of the New World Order. I "know" it.
That doesn't necessarily mean they will prevail. They've been at it for hundreds of centuries and have fallen flat every time.
As I sit here at the keyboard, heaving a sigh of relief that these last three are finally complete, I must confess to our reader that of all the depressing lies we have uncovered, this has been the toughest pill for your writer to swallow. Actually, I am nauseous and emotionally exhausted.
I have been a flag-waving, heart-bursting-with-pride-American for my entire life. I have given thanks many, many times to be blessedly born into this world in America, the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Three years of my life (from early 1993 through late 1995) were spent defending and protecting the Constitution for the United States of America, when a last-ditch effort was made by the elite to open a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con). In 1993, twelve states simultaneously introduced resolutions calling for a Con-Con; they were all defeated soundly. In 1995 another back-door attempt was made via the Conference of States. I believed our success in blocking that was a series of "miracles".
Maybe it was. Maybe there is something in that Constitution that scares hell out of the Creatures, the would-be gods who dream of ruling the entire world. Maybe our efforts simply slowed them down. If our reader would like to see a history of that attempt, and our efforts, see www.sweetliberty.org/concon.htm
When I realized a few years back that the "American Flag" does NOT represent America, but is, instead the U.S. Corporate Military Flag (they plant it where ever a battle is won, including flying them from the army tanks that annihilated the men, women and children in Waco, Texas). . . when I could no longer deny that fact, we removed the red, white and blue from the Sweetliberty.org website, replacing it with the individual state flags.
Today, I am ashamed of "America", and ashamed to call myself an "American". I do not like the dream in which we live, because it isn't a dream, it's a nightmare. It's a nightmare dreamt up by some unseen (maybe other-dimensional) nasty creatures who've had eons to study and learn "human" nature. That's how they pull their minions into the implementation of the plan, and the masses into their system.
And maybe when enough of us do become consciously aware of that, refuse to be part of their nightmare, and to the extent that we can, live outside of their "system", with our goal being: "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you". . . who knows? Maybe miracles WILL happen, and we will find ourselves in a world where Love Lives. Maybe that world is here, awaiting the awakening of a critical mass.
Let us now see what we've discovered in Chapter 19.
_________________________